S.L. 327.88 Art. 62Where revision is not in agreement with published result.

If the examiner conducting the revision is of the opinion that there are objective grounds for changing the result either upwards or downwards, the examiner shall communicate the findings to the chairman of the Board of Examiners, who shall convene a meeting of the Board of Examiners, including the examiner who conducted the revision, to discuss the paper. The Board of Examiners shall follow the procedures outlined in regulations 24 and 25. If the mutatis mutandis examiner’s recommendation is to revise the marks downwards, the

Board of Examiners shall only agree to the recommendation if it results in a change of grade. A pass grade shall not be downgraded to a failing grade; if it is found that extra marks in a passing grade have been given by mistake, these marks shall be removed provided that the final percentage mark is not less than the minimum pass mark.