S.L. 327.88 Art. 14Review procedure.

(1) The examination process shall include a review procedure as follows:

(a) when a paper is set by one or two examiners, another member of the Board of Examiners shall be designated as the reviewer; and

(b) when three or more examiners are responsible for the setting of an examination paper, and it is not practicable to appoint another member to act solely as reviewer, the review process shall be conducted by members of the Board of Examiners so that the questions and associated mark schemes prepared by one examiner are reviewed by another.

(2) The reviewer shall:

(a) ensure that the examination paper is clear and unambiguous and that it addresses the learning outcomes of the Study-Unit in question;

(b) ensure that the examination paper is properly proofread and that the paper and mark scheme are free of error and of the required standard;

(c) ensure that the marks allotted to each question are indicated on the examination paper;

(d) work out the paper him/herself to look out for any inconsistencies and discrepancies where applicable; and

(e) if the chairman of the Board of Examiners considers that due to the nature of the examination paper, or the large number of students registered on the study-unit, or other valid reason, the reviewer is also required to participate in marking, the Chairman shall indicate this to the person concerned at the time he is informed of his appointment as reviewer.